One Health

Bridging the silos: Why the One Health approach is our best defence against future pandemics

At dawn in a livestock trading hub outside Lomé, Togo, herders arrive with goats, chickens, and cattle. The market hums with life, but local veterinarians have noticed something troubling: a rise in sudden livestock deaths, paired with unusual fevers spreading among nearby farming families. In years past, these signals might have been dismissed as unrelated – an animal health problem here, a human health issue there.

But today, they’re being connected through a new lens. With support from the Pandemic Fund, countries are applying a One Health approach, linking surveillance teams across human, animal, and environmental sectors. When veterinary officers flag anomalies in livestock, that data now feeds directly into public health monitoring systems – giving authorities a crucial early-warning edge before local outbreaks grow into national or even regional threats.

This Togo scenario reflects a fundamental truth about pandemic origins: roughly 75 percent of emerging infectious diseases jump from animals to humans. Yet our traditional response systems – with ministries responsible for human health, agriculture, and environment – often miss these critical early warning signals.

When health systems work in silos, they are fighting a multi-front war with limited visibility. Diseases do not respect institutional boundaries, so neither should our responses.

This realization has sparked a global shift toward One Health – an integrated approach that recognizes the interconnection between human, animal, and environmental health.

When health systems work in silos, they are fighting a multi-front war with limited visibility. Diseases do not respect institutional boundaries, so neither should our responses.

What's at stake?

FAO's projects show One Health's transformative potential, but they also highlight the cost of continuing with fragmented approaches. When surveillance systems operate in isolation, early warning signals get lost in institutional gaps. When laboratories from veterinary and public health do not have netowrks form network for sample referral, corss-validation, and lack standardized protocols for testing unusual health events of zoonotic nature valuable time is wasted coordinating responses. When response teams aren't trained to work across sectors, opportunities for rapid containment slip away.

The COVID-19 pandemic's economic toll – estimated at USD 16 trillion globally – underscores what happens when health crises spiral out of control. Compare this to the relatively modest investments required for One Health systems: surveillance networks, laboratory upgrades, training programs, and coordination platforms that collectively cost far less than managing pandemic fallout.

Scaling success

We have the blueprints for scaling One Health globally, but success requires coordinated action across multiple levels.

Donor agencies and international partners must prioritize One Health in funding decisions, recognizing that integrated approaches deliver better value than parallel investments in separate sectors. The Pandemic Fund's support for these initiatives demonstrates this principle in action.

National governments need policies that break down institutional silos, creating legal frameworks and budget structures that support cross-sector collaboration. This includes joint training programs, shared data systems, and unified command structures for health emergencies.

Regional organizations can facilitate the kind of cooperation seen in the Eastern Caribbean, helping countries pool resources and coordinate responses across borders.

Building tomorrow's defences today

The path forward is clear: invest in surveillance systems that cross sectoral boundaries, build laboratories equipped for multi-species and multi-pathogen diagnosis, train response teams that think beyond traditional silos, and create governance structures that enable rapid, coordinated action.

Find out more
Projects
Pandemic Fund projects

FAO is co-leading the implementation of 32 Pandemic Fund projects worth over USD 165 million aimed to boost local and global health security.

Highlights
The economic case for One Health in agrifood systems: Why prevention pays

As global food systems face mounting pressures a prevention focused One Health approach offers compelling economic advantages.

Highlights
Preventing the next pandemic

The emergence and global spread of COVID-19, Avian Flu and other zoonotic diseases cast a spotlight on the interconnectedness of human, animal, and environmental health.