FAO emergencies and resilience

A turning point for food security 

Acute food insecurity has tripled since 2016 to nearly 300 million people, while humanitarian food-sector funding has fallen back toward 2016 levels. Every dollar now has to achieve far more.  

Agriculture offers the strongest return: on average, USD 1 invested in a farmer’s field produces USD 3 in local food value. Yet while up to 80% of acutely food-insecure people live in rural areas, only 5% of relevant funding supports food production.  

FAO’s 2026 Appeal calls for rebalancing global response efforts –  scaling up and sequencing agricultural solutions alongside food and nutrition assistance to feed more people, more sustainably, at lower cost.  

Why a shift in approach is necessary  
The gap between food security needs and available funding is at an all-time high. Crises are deepening, shocks are intensifying, yet we continue to underinvest in agriculture – the most cost-effective tool we have. Supporting agricultural production addresses needs locally, reduces dependence on external aid and eases migration pressures. More food is produced where it is needed, by the people who need it, addressing why they need it.  

The scale and nature of today’s crises make this shift unavoidable, driven by converging pressures:

In 2024, 295 million people across 53 countries and territories faced high acute food insecurity (Integrated Food Security Phase Classification [IPC] Phase 3 and above). This is the sixth consecutive annual increase and nearly three times higher than in 2016. At the most extreme end, the number of people facing starvation and death (IPC Phase 5) has risen ninefold: from 155 000 in 2016 to 1.4 million in 2025 – primarily due to conflict in the Gaza Strip and the Sudan, followed by South Sudan, Yemen, Haiti and Mali. These trends will not reverse without focusing on prevention. 

Acute food insecurity remains concentrated in the same locations. Thirty-five countries and territories have appeared in every Global Report on Food Crises for nine years. These protracted crises now account for over 80 percent of all people in IPC Phase 3 and above. Annual Humanitarian Appeals have been issued in 13 of these same contexts for at least two decades (OCHA FTS). Protracted crises demand more than repeated cycles of short-term aid.

Conflict, economic shocks and weather extremes are driving hunger to unprecedented levels. Since 2018, the number of people whose main driver of acute food insecurity is conflict nearly doubled (74 million to 140 million). Those driven by weather extremes tripled (29 million to 96 million), while people affected primarily by economic shocks increased sixfold (10 million to 59 million). These forces are accelerating and compounding. Conflict has led to Famine in the Gaza Strip and parts of the Sudan in 2025, and risk of Famine in parts of South Sudan. High inflation in these and other contexts further restricts access to food. Climate shocks are hitting harder and more often, destroying food production and deepening food insecurity. Rural people, especially women and youth, are disproportionately affected. Building resilience to shocks reduces their impact.

The 2026 outlook remains deeply challenging. Several contexts are at high risk of further deterioration. The Sudan, Palestine, South Sudan, Yemen, Mali and Haiti are of highest concern – with populations facing or at risk of Catastrophe (IPC Phase 5). The Democratic Republic of the Congo, Myanmar, Nigeria, Somalia, the Syrian Arab Republic and Afghanistan already have large populations facing critical levels of acute food insecurity, with needs expected to rise further through 2026. Burkina Faso, Chad, Kenya and Rohingya refugees in Bangladesh also risk deteriorating acute food insecurity through May 2026. Forecasts must lead to actions that change the course of food crises.

While acute hunger rises, financing falls drastically short. By November 2025, the Global Humanitarian Overview (GHO) is only a quarter funded at USD 11.5 billion out of USD 45 billion required – the largest gap ever recorded. 

Due to steep funding cuts and shortfalls, the 2025 GHO was forced to hyper-prioritize: focusing on 114 million out of 300 million people in need and seeking USD 29 billion of the total requirement. And even for them, only 36 percent of financial needs were met by November 2025.

Humanitarian food sector funding began declining after its peak in 2022: down 31 percent in 2023, followed by 5 percent in 2024 and 25 percent in 2025 under optimistic scenarios. This has reduced aid coverage, food rations and acute malnutrition treatment even for the most vulnerable. Rising needs cannot be met by doing less with less –  cost effectiveness is now a humanitarian imperative.

 The gap between needs and funding has never been greater

Funding gap chart

Agriculture: the frontline of food security 

Agriculture is the foundation of our food supply, yet in times of crisis too little attention goes to securing food at its source. When farmers harvest, herders keep healthy livestock and fishers maintain their catch, food is available locally. Families earn income and access essential nutrition. Markets stabilize. 

This matters because most acutely food-insecure people are producers, not just consumers. Supporting their ability to produce food is far more cost-effective and sustainable than delivering food to rural families season after season. It is what over 70% of rural households are asking for: help to secure their next harvest, protect their livestock and rebuild their livelihoods. 

Agriculture is a decisive factor in food security: 

  • Declining harvests and herds drive hunger up. 
  • Restored production brings hunger down. 

To reverse rising food insecurity, agriculture must be leveraged at scale. This Appeal calls on partners to make that shift — in mindset, programming and investment. The goal is simple: assistance needs to strengthen local food systems, not continually replace them. 

FAO’s comparative advantage across emergency and resilience 

FAO protects and restores food production in crises and strengthens resilience to prevent recurring hunger.  

In emergencies, agricultural support is life-saving. Protecting livestock preserves daily milk for children. Emergency seed can put food on the table in as little as three months and sustain families for up to a year. 

For long-term resilience, FAO addresses the root causes of vulnerability by working with communities and local systems – cooperatives, suppliers, civil society and extension services – to stabilize livelihoods across seasons and shocks.  

FAO’s approach is evidence-driven and grounded in technical expertise to ensure that the right assistance reaches those most in need.  

Key focus areas   
Evidence has never mattered more. Sharp funding cuts are forcing zero-sum choices about which crises and populations to prioritize at a time of record need. These decisions require rigorous, impartial and timely food security data. 
Helping people produce food locally is necessary to prevent Famine. Where conflict cuts off supply lines, local production can become the only food source, as tragically seen in Gaza. The urgency to secure short harvests, steady milk production for children and other vital nutrition cannot be overstated.
Prevention is among the least funded forms of aid, though it can save the most lives and money. Anticipatory action receives less than 1% of global humanitarian funding, yet every dollar invested generates up to seven in avoided losses and benefits for rural communities. Rural areas bear the brunt of climate and food system shocks – and their impacts ripple far beyond. Prevention must start there.
Emergency agriculture is life-saving and its benefits quickly multiply. Agriculture is how most rural families access and afford food. When production stops, they lose both the food itself and the income to buy it. Emergency agriculture restores both in the shortest time possible.
Restoring livelihoods where displaced people settle – and when they return – is essential for durable solutions. Many displaced people originate from and settle in rural areas. FAO works with both displaced and host communities to boost food production, increase income opportunities and create conditions for social cohesion.
Evidence of impact and the need to scale up 

In 2024, FAO’s emergency and resilience programme assisted 42.4 million people across 75 countries, raising yields, protecting livestock and reducing negative coping strategies.  

In Afghanistan, families produced 360 kg more wheat than non-assisted farmers – enough to feed two additional people for a year. In Somalia, every dollar invested in seed produced more than five in food. In Chad, improved livestock production and child nutrition counselling cut severe acute malnutrition by 81%. In the Sudan, seed deliveries kept food in markets despite conflict. In Ukraine, cash plus livestock support helped 76% of assisted families avoid negative coping and meet their food needs for up to ten months. 

Agricultural assistance consistently delivers high returns and pays for itself. FAO has the tools and expertise to scale rapidly – but requires predictable, timely and greater funding to meet the scale of need. 

Unprecedented nationwide support to Afghan farmers contributed to halving acute food insecurity – from 23 million to 9.5 million people (2021–25) – despite drought, floods, locusts and political transition.
Integrated animal health, feed and child nutrition counselling boosted milk production by 66%, raised children's milk intake by 40%, halved diarrhoea and respiratory illness, and cut severe malnutrition risk by 81%. 

Agriculture drives durable solutions by strengthening resilience, self-reliance and local integration. In Uganda, for example, agricultural support increased refugee incomes by 50%  and host incomes by 28%.

By October 2025, FAO reached 120 000 people with combinations of crop, livestock, cash and voucher assistance across nine of Haiti's ten departments. 60% of households supported were in Grande Anse, where sustained efforts contributed to shift the department from IPC Phase 4 to Phase 3.
Integrated cash and livestock assistance made the difference during drought. Assisted households preserved their animals and generated USD 248 worth of milk monthly, while non-assisted households lost 40% of their animals – over USD 1 400 in assets.
Each dollar spent to protect a boat avoided USD 70 in losses. All protected boats survived, allowing fishers to resume work immediately. 

Fodder value chain support contributed to a 38% increase in daily milk production and 71% rise in income from milk sales.

In 2025, FAO reached 4 million Sudanese with quality seed, including 1.3 million in Darfur and Kordofan.

Global requirements
requirements2
 Regional requirements

USD 521.6 million to assist 30.5 million people 

USD 471.6 million to assist 18.4 million people 

USD 64.7 million to assist 358 713 people 

USD 111.9 million to assist 1.3 million people 

USD 519.1 million to assist 29.2 million people 

USD 179.6 million to assist 5.3 million people 

USD 593.4 million to assist 17.7 million people USD 593.4 million to assist 17.7 million people 

Country requirements

People first

FAO's approach starts with people and their right to food. It centres on restoring agency to farmers and producers to lead their own recovery.

Accountability in action
Communities participate meaningfully in programme design, implementation and monitoring. Feedback mechanisms, accessible to all, guide programmes and build trust.

Gender equality and empowerment
FAO promotes women's leadership, ensures equitable access to resources and elevates women's voices in decision-making.

Zero tolerance for sexual exploitation and abuse
FAO enforces the highest standards of conduct through mandatory training, clear reporting channels and survivor-centred support. 

Responsible delivery
Strong compliance systems – safeguarding policies, partner vetting and monitoring – ensure assistance is delivered transparently and responsibly.

Our commitment
Across all its work, FAO protects people, upholds rights, amplifies voices and ensures that emergency assistance strengthens resilience.

FAO delivers through strategic partnerships

FAO combines its core expertise with the strengths of local, national and international partners to maximize results. This wide network includes ministries, local organizations, NGOs, UN agencies, regional bodies and global partnership platforms like the Global Network Against Food Crises.

In 2024, FAO delivered emergency and resilience support in partnership with 25 international organizations and more than 400 national and local partners - backed by 40 resource partners whose shared commitment and collaboration made this possible.

How partners can contribute 

FAO’s 2026 requirements sit within a broader 2026–2028 plan. Partners can support through:

  • Unearmarked contributions to FAO's Special Fund for Emergency and Resilience Activities (SFERA) for rapid, flexible emergency action.
  • Soft-earmarked funding for regions, countries or themes such as anticipatory action, also through SFERA.
  • Earmarked programmes, including multiyear commitments that enable long-term resilience planning.
Screenshot 2025-12-01 at 9.50.34 PM

FAO's Global Emergency and Resilience Appeal 2026

FAO’s Global Appeal 2026 calls for urgent investment in agriculture as the most cost‑effective way to address acute food insecurity. With over 100 million people targeted across 54 countries, the Appeal seeks USD 2.5 billion to deliver emergency assistance, build resilience, and sustain global technical services.

 

Download the Global Appeal

 

 

FAO's Emergency and Resilience Plans
Publications
Chad: Emergency and Resilience Plan, 2026–2028 (In French)
02/12/2025

Chad is facing an unprecedented humanitarian crisis that affects more than one‑third of its population, despite substantial and rapidly increasing investments...

Publications
Democratic Republic of the Congo: Emergency and Resilience Plan, 2026–2028 (In French)
28/10/2025

The Democratic Republic of the Congo is facing a prolonged and multidimensional food crisis, driven by a combination of armed conflict, displacement,...

Publications
Mali: Emergency and Resilience Plan, 2026–2028 (In French)
24/11/2025

Mali is facing a complex and protracted humanitarian crisis driven by armed conflict, insecurity, and the impacts of climate shocks.

Publications
Syrian Arab Republic: Emergency and Resilience Plan 2026–2028
02/12/2025

After 14 years of conflict and recurrent climate shocks, the agriculture sector has been among the hardest hit in the Syrian Arab Republic, with severe...

Publications
Yemen: Plan of Action for Emergency, Resilience and Development 2025–2027
23/10/2025

Conflict, economic decline and climatic shocks continue to erode the resilience of rural communities in Yemen.